Is Silicon Valley Experiencing a Brain Drain?


Wednesday, April 15th, 2009
Looking west over northern San Jose (downtown ...
Image via Wikipedia

For all the people who have been complaining…fearing… that foreigners take away jobs from Americans, you don’t have to worry this year and who knows about the years to come. 

 

According to Daya Baran, this year, 2009, the petitions that were received  filled only half of the 65,000 available visas. Why are skilled professionals moving out of opting to go home, instead of applying to stay in the US? Why aren’t they coming here anymore – in large numbers –  from abroad  to realize their high tech-dreams?

 

There could be several reasons: the recession, the fact that life here is incredibly expensive, the availability of the Internet and the fact that you can create a business anywhere you have a lap top and wireless, plus a good brain, of course.

 

Whatever the reasons be, the brain drain that we are experiencing  here is not good for our creativity, our economy , our constant innovations and the structure of our diverse society. Let’s hope that our current government sees the need for retaining the foreign Master’s and PhD students who are now leaving the US and for creating incentives to attract more of the skilled labor force in Math and Science  that we need here to come and apply for the rest of the remaining visas.

 

 

Share This Post



Is the US making a mistake limiting H-1B visas?


Sunday, April 12th, 2009
Image by via Flickr

The New York Times is currently featuring a series on skilled foreign-born workers and their limited access to H-1B visas. The Times raises the question whether these highly skilled foreign-born workers plus foreign students who have finished their degrees in US colleges should get some kind of permanent work status or have to leave and go back home?

In theory, this would give job openings to US citizens. However, because the US is not keeping up with the Indians, for example, in Math and Computer Science, can Americans fill the jobs that the high tech sector needs to stay not only competitive, but also ahead of the curve?

We need immigrant expertise to keep Silicon Valley moving forward; as the Times says: Many innovators in Silicon Valley come from overseas; 42 percent of engineers with master’s degrees and 60 percent of those with engineering Ph.D.’s in the United States are foreign-born.

Do we want these trained professionals to go home to their native countries, or do we want to share in their success with them – benefiting not only from their contributions to our tech sector (and other sectors, of course) but even in the taxes they are paying once they have made it in their fields.

The limit on H1-B visas was raised from 65,000 two times as the technology sector boomed, to 115,000 in 1999 and to 195,000 in 2001. But the number of H-1B visas reverted to 65,000 in 2004. (There are an additional 20,000 H1-B’s for people with graduate degrees from American universities.)

However, since the year 2004, there has been a growing gap between the number of H-1B visas companies look to get and those that are assigned to them through a lottery.

In 2008, companies made 163,000 applications for the 65,000 available visas. And, if I remember correctly, those were gone within a day.

Can we afford to limit the number of H 1-B visas or would we, the US, not benefit from giving qualified, highly educated immigrants the visas they need to help keep this country in the forefront of high tech and economic development?

Share This Post



Immigrants settling into the United States


Friday, March 13th, 2009
Location of the United States
Image via Wikipedia

See where and how  many immigrants settled in the United States thanks to an article in the New York Times.

Share This Post



Seesmic, CoolIris, Ubergizmo, l’Atelier Speak at Internationally Cool & Plugged In Event


Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Cooley event photos by-karsten-lemm

Eliane Fiolet, Hubert Nguyen, Loic le Meur Eliane Fiolet, Hubert, Nguyen, Loic le Meur, Dominique Piotet, Soujanya Bumkhar and Angelika Blendstrup/Daniel Zimmerman, co-moderators, at last week’s event, “Internationally Cool and Plugged in.”

Photos from

130 people attended the event held at Cooley Godward, Palo Alto sponsored by  GABA, the French American Chamber of Commerce and iHouse, UC Berkeley.

Cooley-Eliane Fiolet, Hubert Nguyen, Angelika Blendstrup

 

 

 

 

Share This Post



Can GOOG-411/US Conquer Foreign Accents?


Saturday, January 3rd, 2009
Google in 1998
Image via Wikipedia

Can GOOG-411/US conquer foreign accents?

 

Imagine an Indian, Frenchman or Chinese looking to call a local US business number using GOOG-411. Needless to say, it can become a very frustrating.

If we think of a Chinese English speaker, who often doesn’t pronounce the consonants in the word or the endings, trying to get the number of, say, Whole Foods in Palo Alto, he/she would have a problem.

 

Palo Alto could sound like ‘Pao Au(t)o’ and Whole Foods would be ‘Ho Foo, Holl Fooooo’, or some variation and when I tried it this way, the voice on the phone told me to “go back”  and basically try again, every time.

 

GOOG-411 is a service from Google that lets you get business phone numbers through any phone – for free. However, with a few exceptions, it is the information service (which is probably free because it is training the application in understanding many different voices), which is geared toward people who speak US English.

 

As we all know not all English speakers sound the same. I think that Google still has a long way to go until they can fit their model to the way our multi-cultural group of people in Silicon Valley and around the globe speak English. Or maybe Google will develop a variation of its service according to the country and accent of the people it is trying to reach?

 

It did launch a service in Canada where: “according to Google engineers, the service has been tweaked to offer “Canadian English.” “We incorporated some ‘Canadianisms’ such as ‘eh,’ ‘Traw-na,’ ‘Cal-gry,’ and, of course, ‘aboot,’” a blog post said.

 

Apparently Google and Microsoft are spending millions to attract users whose native language is other than English, so Indian English is probably one of their targets.

Mr. Ram Prakash said in the NY Times that “ Western technology companies have misunderstood the linguistic landscape of India, where English is spoken proficiently by only about a tenth of the population and even many college-educated Indians prefer the contours of their native tongues for everyday speech.”

 

GOOG-411 will either have to test its service for many years to come capture all the voice, language and dialect variations or limit GOOG-411 to the mainly English-speaking people who sound American. In the meantime, we can all have fun with business names it does offer us when we don’t have the right US intonation – even the British are not exempt (see web site for examples). Your own examples?

 

Share This Post



Conversation with the CEO of Silicon Valley’s coolest little plug-in – CoolIris


Tuesday, December 30th, 2008



cooliris logo 150x150 Conversation with the CEO of Silicon Valley’s coolest little plug in CoolIris

 

I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with Soujanya Bhumkar,  CEO and Co-founder of the coolest browser add-on around – CoolIris!

 

On February 25, 2009, at the law offices of Cooley Godward in Palo Alto, he and other inspiring entrepreneurs will tell us about their start ups and what it takes to make them successful. Stay tuned for more details.

Share This Post



When you speak English – can people understand you easily?


Sunday, July 6th, 2008
AnimationImage via Wikipedia

These questions are taken from my web site: I thought it might be interesting to answer them in writing. Please write to me with other points you’re aware of and we can discuss them.

 

o Do you need to change the way you speak?

 

If people look at you with question marks in their eyes, if they ask you to repeat what you said, you could probably use some help.

 

o Do you speak too fast? Or too slowly?

 

Most of the time, speaking too fast is a problem for foreign-born English speakers. Many cultures seem to think that speaking fast means you also think fast, but if you have an accent, that causes problems – so slow down!

 

o Do you drop consonants at the end of your words?

 

Now this is a major issue! Words have consonants for a reason – note the differences among fine/file/fight etc. but without the last sounds in the words, [and you just say /fi/] the real meanings are hard to figure out.

 

o Do you add the plural /s/ at the end of your words?

 

Even if I know that you are talking about a plural and are just forgetting to put in the /s/ at the end, it becomes annoying after a while, because I constantly have to discern if you are referring to one or to many.

 

o Do you use articles: /a/ and /the/ ?

 

Again, not a major issues, but paired with no plurals, it can add to the confusion.

 

o Do you say /like/ you know/ basically/ in your sentences?

 

Now this is totally annoying and really takes away your credibility. Avoid these words like the plague!

 

o Do you use /um/ and /eh/ in your presentations?

 

This is just a [dumb] habit and can be “unlearned” by paying attention when you speak.

 

o Do people you talk to look puzzled or ask you to repeat several times?

 

A wake-up call that you are either speaking incoherently or your accent is causing you problems.

 

o Do you get nervous when you know you have to speak in front of your team or outside customers?

You can avoid being terribly nervous if you are very well prepared – a small amount of nervousness is good, it keeps you on your toes.

 

o Do people finish your sentences for you?

 

It can be that you are looking for words, translating from your native language or you don’t know how to get to the point quickly enough and others want to help you. Ask someone around you to give you ideas why this is happening.

 

o Do you change your sentences in the middle because you are not sure how to finish them or another grammatical construction occurrs to you which might be easier?

 

This is very strenuous for the listener because you are constantly changing direction and it is hard to follow. Just finish the sentence and then think of another, maybe better way to go on.

 

o Do people stop listening to you after you have spoken for a while?

 

You need professional help to understand why this is happening because it can be due to accent, content, the way you speak or even the subject matter.

 

o Does your voice go down at the end of the sentence and people can’t hear the last point you are making?

 

It is not that bad in normal conversation, but if you are giving a speech or are teaching, it makes listening to you too difficult. So tape yourself while presenting and see if you mumble at the end of a remark or leave it out all together .

 

Changing English speaking habits begins by you taping yourself or having someone video tape you when you are speaking. Then you can analyze what your main problems are and can start working on them;it does help to use the insights of a trained professional, but you can make a lot of headway by yourself with discipline and dedication.

 

 

 

Share This Post



Free the H-1Bs, Free the Economy – Vivek Wadhwa/August 2009


Friday, November 13th, 2009

I just found this troublesome article [in TechCrunch] by  Vivek Wadhwa, who in other articles frequently points out to us that our immigrants, the ones who come here, get incredible degrees, found companies, develop patents, are now going home, back to their countries to live a life in a community that values them more. I present the article in its entirety because any comment  or excerpt of mine would not do it justice.

 

This is a guest post [August 2009] by Vivek Wadhwa, an entrepreneur turned academic. He is a Visiting Scholar at UC-Berkeley, Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School and Executive in Residence at Duke University. Follow him on Twitter at @vwadhwa.

 

I have a suggestion for our President on how to boost economic growth without spending a penny: Free the H-1B’s.

 

More than a million doctors, engineers, scientists, researchers, and other skilled workers and their families in the U.S. are stuck in “immigration limbo.” They entered the country legally and have contributed disproportionately to our nation’s competitiveness. They paid our high taxes and have been model citizens. All they want to do is to share the American dream and help us grow our economy.

 

They could be starting companies, buying houses, building community centers, and splurging like Americans. But because we don’t have enough permanent-resident visas (green cards) for them, they’re stuck in the same old jobs they had maybe a decade ago when they entered this country. They are getting really frustrated and many are returning to their home countries to becomeunwilling competitors. And they are taking our economic recovery with them.

 

Xenophobes will claim that immigrants take jobs away and blame them for everything that is wrong in their lives and in America. But as TechCrunch wrote last week, skilled immigrants create more jobs than they take away. That is a fact. My research team documented that one quarter of all technology and engineering startups nationwide from 1995 to 2005 were started by immigrants. In Boston, it was 31%, in New York, 44%, and in Silicon Valley an astonishing 52%. In 2005, these immigrant founded companies employed 450,000 workers. Add it up. That’s far more than all the tech workers we gave green cards to in that period.

 

It’s not only jobs that they’ve created. In 2006, more than 25% of U.S. global patents had authors who were born abroad – and this doesn’t even count people like me, who came here, became citizens, and then filed multiple patents. Of Qualcomm’s global patents, 72% had foreign-born authors, as did 65% of Merck’s, 64% of GE’s, and 60% of Cisco’s. I’m not talking about silly patents filed with the U.S. Patent Office here, I’m talking about WIPO PCT  applications – the patents that help our companies compete globally.

 

Why does Silicon Valley need a foreign-born workforce? Because these immigrants are able come to a foreign land where they face hardship and discrimination and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the world’s best technical minds and most successful entrepreneurs.  They are able motivate Silicon Valley’s top guns to work even harder and think smarter. They add a global perspective and enrich America.

 

The largest immigrant founding groups are Indian, British, and Chinese. Indian-born immigrants, for example, founded 6.7% of America’s tech companies and 15.5% of those in Silicon Valley — but, according to the U.S. census, constitute way less than 1% of the U.S. population. So do the Chinese, but they contribute to 16.8% of our global patents. It doesn’t take a statistician to figure that these are pretty impressive numbers.

 

Yes, I know that H-1B’s don’t start companies. And that is the problem. We don’t let them.

 

Hundreds of thousands of mostly very smart and highly educated workers who could be starting companies are not. While they wait for their green cards, they can’t even change jobs or accept a promotion, for fear of losing their turn in line. If they lose their job, they have zero days to find another one – or get booted out of the country. Their employers know that these workers aren’t going anywhere, so they can go easy on the salary increases and bonuses. Some unscrupulous employers do take advantage of them. And their spouses usually can’t work, and in some states can’t even get drivers licenses, because they don’t have social-security numbers. Does this sound like America?

 

Unlike the daunting economic problems facing the country, this problem is easy to fix. Just increase the number of green cards for skilled workers. Maybe let them cut the line if they buy a house or start a company that employs a bunch of Americans. My guess is that we’ll get tens of thousands of startups and a couple of hundred thousand houses sold. That is a bigger economic boost than the clunkers program we’ve just thrown $2 billion dollars at.

Share This Post



Jack Welsh’s “Lebensweisheit” : The 10 Leadership Principles


Saturday, August 8th, 2009
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

I read an interesting, short article that Peter Isackson wrote for the Intercultural Insights Group, he brought up the simple yet profound leadership principles that Jack Welsh developed in his time as CEO at GE. Are they as relevant today as they were when he wrote them?

*1.* There is only one way ˆ the straight way. It sets the tone of the
organization.

*2.* Be open to the best of what everyone, everywhere, has to offer;
transfer learning across your organization.
*3.* Get the right people in the right jobs ˆ it is more important than
developing a strategy.
*4.* An informal atmosphere is a competitive advantage.
*5.* Make sure everybody counts and everybody knows they count.
*6.* Legitimate self-confidence is a winner ˆ the true test of
self-confidence is the courage to be open.
*7.* Business has to be fun ˆ celebrations energise an organisation.
*8.* Never underestimate the other guy.

*9.* Understand where real value is added and put your best people there.
*10.* Know when to meddle and when to let go ˆ this is pure instinct.

I think that #4 is a point that would be debatable in Europe and Asia – what do you think, is the business trend toward informality or do these societies still want the hierarchic distance?
And, the notion of having fun [#7] when working as a prerequisite to working creatively and energetically still has not penetrated the minds of the many of the older kinds of organizations, but I think that without fun, why would people want to do their best work for a company?

When I present to foreign companies, and I mention that in the US, having fun is often a goal, I frequently get dismissive looks and comments that this is not something serious and as such isn’t important. Too bad, for as long as the notion of fun is still considered frivolous, it won’t happen.

Share This Post



Even though we need foreign-born professionals here in the US, the H-1B visa hounds are after them again.


Monday, May 18th, 2009
Looking west over northern San Jose (downtown ...
Image via Wikipedia

As Vivek Wadhwa said in Business Week, “For the third year running, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) have taken aim at immigrant labor.”  It seems that both of these senators want to “reduce the abuse” of the high tech companies that hire cheaper, foreign labor in the place of more expensive, skilled American workers. The bill would mandate that employers hiring H-1B visa holders would have to swear that they did a good faith search for an American who could fill the job, but one could not be found; in addition, 1% of the companies hiring H-1B visa holders would be audited.

 

What will that produce? As Wadhwa points out, large companies will slowly feel more and more constricted hiring employees through the H-1B program. And where will that leave us, in the US in general and especially in Silicon Valley?  If we look at the Silicon Valley Index, 2009, 36% of our population here is foreign born; it is a fact  that 50% of all start-ups founded here have an immigrant or a first generation founder and according to a study by the National Association of Venture Capitalists: Immigrant-founded venture-backed public companies today employ an estimated 220,000 people in the United States and

over 400,000 people globally.

 

Can we really afford to turn away potential employers and contributors to our economic success? Maybe the senators should think again.

 

 

Share This Post